Chinatown campus contractors request more funds

Construction updates presented at the March 10 Facilities, Infrastructure and Technology Committee meeting revealed past delays are affecting the budget of the Chinatown/North Beach campus project and the start of construction on City College’s new performing arts center.

By Emily Daly
The Guardsman

Construction  updates presented at the March 10 Facilities, Infrastructure and  Technology Committee meeting revealed past delays are affecting the  budget of the Chinatown/North Beach campus project and the start of  construction on City College’s new performing arts center.

Three Chinatown/North Beach contractors are requesting additional funds under resolution B2, also discussed at the meeting.

Elmast  Construction and Inspection services requested $750,000 more for the  additional inspection services needed for the remainder of the project,  since their original contract was for only one year.

Apex  Testing Laboratories, Inc. and ISI, Inc. requested a total of $643,520  for an extension of special inspection services and testing mandated by  the DSA.

EHDD  Construction and Barcelon & Jang requested an additional $384,698  for the five-month extension of their original contract agreement,  bringing the new contract amount to $14,745,035.

Board  president John Rizzo said the delays occurred shortly before  construction began, when former Vice Chancellor James Blomquist started  the contractor bidding for the project before getting the state’s  approval. When Blomquist left, all the contracts had to be rebid. A  similar situation affected City College’s soccer field, Rizzo said.

Andy  Sohn, a representative from EHDD construction, said the request for  more payment is related to the additional meetings and staffing required  because of these delays. Sohn said the contractor feels they are  entitled to it contractually, since the schedule change was out of their  control.

“I’m open to be persuaded, but I haven’t seen the evidence they are entitled to it,” said Rizzo.
Rizzo  expressed concern that tasks such as additional meetings would cause a  change in the contract. He said if the company asks for additional money  a third time, the board would inquire if delaying work on the project  would equal a breach of contract.

“What  we did not do in this case was simple math,” Sohn said. The contractors  came up with the new payment by identifying extra tasks they had to  complete, instead of multiplying the current payment by the additional  length of time the work is expected to take.

Rizzo  said any future budget cuts would not affect the North Beach campus,  but could affect construction on the Performing Arts Center, which is  partially funded by bonds from 2001 and 2005. The state of California  doesn’t have the bond money, which is why construction on the project  hasn’t begun.

Also  stalling the project is the incomplete land-swap deal between City  College and San Francisco, Rizzo said. City College owns the south half  of the campus, while San Francisco owns the north half. Once City  College owns the section of land the performing arts center will be  built on, construction can begin.

Rizzo  said the deal was agreed to years ago, and there are no disagreements,  controversies or problems in the way of the deal, which would include  signing paperwork and getting approval from the Board of Supervisors.

“It’s  pure dithering,” Rizzo said. “The city is at risk of losing a $75  million construction project.” This loss would also eliminate potential  construction jobs, he said.

Other  construction updates included news that the soccer field is expected to  be completed by the end of July. All practical issues regarding its  construction have been resolved, said Peter Goldstein, vice chancellor  of Finance and Administration.

Email:
edaly@theguardsman.com