Modesto college cuts journalism

Modesto Junior College administration’s drastic cuts to several popular programs, including the elimination of the entire mass communications department, are at best driven by hopeless ignorance and at worst designed to silence student voices at the school.

By The Guardsman Staff

Modesto  Junior College administration’s drastic cuts to several popular  programs, including the elimination of the entire mass communications  department, are at best driven by hopeless ignorance and at worst  designed to silence student voices at the school.

In  late February, MJC President Gaither Loewenstein proposed cutting the  mass communications department, along with the faculty adviser to  student government, as a solution to the college’s projected $8 million  deficit for 2011-12 fiscal year.

Despite  opposition from the entire college community and an offer from faculty  to take pay cuts  to save their programs, Loewenstein and the school  district’s board of trustees shirked shared governance and transparency  laws and unilaterally approved the cuts.

“We  feel that he’s deliberately handicapped any type of protest at the  college,” MJC journalism instructor and newspaper advisor Laura Paull  said.

It  appears Loewenstein and the board will succeed next year in closing  MJC’s award-winning newspaper, The Pirates’ Log, which has been an  institution at the school since 1926.
Lowenstein justified eliminating the mass communications department by questioning the viability of journalism as a profession.

His  unapologetic stance that an industry’s profitability defines its value  rather than the essential principles it upholds is frightening. It  sickens the The Guardsman that a man in charge of educating future  California professionals would have such ignorance or disregard of the  civic necessity fulfilled by the press.

In  the budget proposal the board rubber-stamped, Loewenstein, wrote that  journalism’s future lies in “new media,” which he described as “the  convergence of computer graphics, gaming, digital applications and the  Internet as means of delivery with content derived from the traditional  disciplines of art, music and theatre.”

According  to Loewenstein’s convoluted media scholarship, the new role of the  press, an institution enshrined in the First Amendment to the U.S.  Constitution, will be to produce entertaining content for video games,  or that training in art, music and theater is applicable to work in a  newsroom.

It  is true that journalism is a tough business to break into these days.  The stakes have risen, competition has increased, pay has dropped and  the reputations of large media corporations in the U.S. – the sole  source of news for many Americans – are in shambles.

But  a new generation of journalists is poised to redefine the industry  based on a new model that does not sacrifice the truth for slight  increases in profit margins. We are in the middle of a “new media”  revolution, but not of the kind Loewenstein described in his budget cuts  proposal.

Journalists  at The Guardsman and The Pirates’ Log are already heavily invested in  using all forms of “new media” to present our content, including  multimedia and various forms of social networking. No skills learned in  theater, music or art classes informed that transition, but rather  reporting, critical thinking, and research skills learned in journalism  classes.

It’s  difficult to believe Loewenstein and the board actually think the  future of journalism lies in video games. Instead they value the First  Amendment’s guarantees of free expression and the press so little, and  power and profit so much, they are willing to say anything to silence  opposition.

But  it won’t work. Any attempts to kill, demean or demoralize the future  journalists of this country will only make us stronger. That is the  level of dedication we have toward printing the truth and checking  corruption. That is the power of “new media.”

Email:
editor@theguardsman.com